About Us
Policy
News
Shop
Scotland
Wales
Sign up to our Newsletters
Contact Us
Research
Search
Home
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Game
Get The Knowledge
GWCT Accredited Game Shot
GWCT Shoot Operator’s Test
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
2023 Breeding Woodcock Survey
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Black Grouse Appeal
Grey Partridge Appeal
Gamebird Releasing Appeal
Trail Camera Appeal
British Woodcock Appeal
Game and Conservation Benchmarking Survey
Shoot Managers' Newsletter
Wildlife
Research
Advice
News
Courses & Training Days
Working for Wildlife
Species of the Month
Managing for More
Action for Curlew
Curlew Badge
Waders For Real
Fox Diet Research Appeal
Wildlife Appeals
Farming
Farming Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count
Research
Advice
The Allerton Project
Auchnerran: Scottish Demonstration Farm
Farmer Clusters
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
GWCT Farming Newsletter
Fish
SAMARCH Project
The Missing Salmon Alliance
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Save Our Salmon Appeal
Salmon Badge
Volunteer
Fisheries Blog
Advice
Advice Blog
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
Meet our advisors
Face to Face Advice
GWCT Advisory Scotland
'How to' Advice
Avian influenza Q & A
Conserving Our Woodcock
Lead Ammunition
Guides and Factsheets
Courses and Training Days
General Licences
Educational Materials
Shoot Benchmarking
FAQs
Game & Wildlife Glossary
Blogs
GWCT News Blog
Farming Blog
Allerton Project Research Blog
Auchnerran Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count Blog
Farmland Ecology Blog
Fisheries Blog
Loddington Estate Blog
Peter Thompson's Wildlife Blog
Rotherfield Demonstration Project Blog
Waders For Real Blog
Woodcock Watch Blog
Uplands Blog
Events
Calendar
Courses and Training Days
Scottish Game Fair
'The Last Keeper' Screenings
Join
Choose your Membership
Renew or Update Details
GWCT Insurance
Why join the GWCT?
How your membership helps
Testimonials
Sign up to our Newsletters
GWCT Morning Briefing Email
Join Offline
Donate
General Donation
Current Appeals
GWCT Raffles
Gun Draw
Grand Grouse Draw
Shoot Sweepstake
GWCT Shop
GWCT Art Gallery
The Allerton Project
In Memoriam Donations
Leaving a Legacy
Fundraising for the GWCT
Charitable Trusts and Foundations
Become a Sponsor
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2010-19
2000-09
2009
BUNNEFELD2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1990-99
1980-89
1970-79
1960-69
1950-59
1940-49
1929-39
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Home
>
Research
>
Scientific Publications
>
2000-09
>
2009
>
BUNNEFELD2009
Factors affecting unintentional harvesting selectivity in a monomorphic species.
Author
Bunnefeld, N., Baines, D., Newborn, D., & Milner-Gulland, E.J.
Citation
Bunnefeld, N., Baines, D., Newborn, D., & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2009). Factors affecting unintentional harvesting selectivity in a monomorphic species. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78: 485-492.
Abstract
Changes in the abundance of populations have always perplexed ecologists but long-term studies are revealing new insights into population dynamic processes. Long-term data are often derived from harvest records although many wild populations face high harvesting pressures leading to overharvesting and extinction. Additionally, harvest records used to describe population processes such as fluctuations in abundance and reproductive success often assume a random off-take.
Selective harvesting based on phenotypic characteristics occurs in many species (e.g. trophy hunting, fisheries) and has important implications for population dynamics, conservation and management.
In species with no marked morphological differences between the age and sex classes, such as the red grouse
Lagopus lagopus scoticus
during the shooting season, hunters cannot consciously select for a specific sex or age class during the shooting process but harvest records could still give a biased reflection of the population structure because of differences in behaviour between age and sex classes.
This study compared age and sex ratios in the bag with those in the population before shooting for red grouse at different points in the shooting season and different densities, which has rarely been tested before.
More young than old grouse were shot at large bag sizes and vice versa for small bag sizes than would be expected from the population composition before shooting. The susceptibility of old males to shooting compared to females increased with bag size and was high at the first time the area was shot but decreased with the number of times an area was harvested.
These findings stress that the assumption made in many studies that harvest records reflect the age and sex ratio of the population and therefore reflect productivity can be misleading.
In this paper, as in the literature, it is also shown that number of grouse shot reflects grouse density and therefore that hunting selectivity might influence population dynamics in a cyclic species.
The study is not only relevant for red grouse but applies to systems showing interactions between selective harvesting and wider ecological processes, such as age- and sex-related parasitism and territoriality, which may drive population fluctuations.
Link
http://www.jstor.org/stable/27696388
About Us
Contact Us
Feedback
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Twitter
Facebook
Web Design by Mentor Digital