About Us
Policy
News
Shop
Scotland
Wales
Sign up to our Newsletters
Contact Us
Research
Search
Home
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Game
Get The Knowledge
GWCT Accredited Game Shot
GWCT Shoot Operator’s Test
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
2023 Breeding Woodcock Survey
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Black Grouse Appeal
Grey Partridge Appeal
Gamebird Releasing Appeal
Trail Camera Appeal
British Woodcock Appeal
Game and Conservation Benchmarking Survey
Shoot Managers' Newsletter
Wildlife
Research
Advice
News
Courses & Training Days
Working for Wildlife
Species of the Month
Managing for More
Action for Curlew
Curlew Badge
Waders For Real
Fox Diet Research Appeal
Wildlife Appeals
Farming
Farming Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count
Research
Advice
The Allerton Project
Auchnerran: Scottish Demonstration Farm
Farmer Clusters
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
GWCT Farming Newsletter
Fish
SAMARCH Project
The Missing Salmon Alliance
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Save Our Salmon Appeal
Salmon Badge
Volunteer
Fisheries Blog
Advice
Advice Blog
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
Meet our advisors
Face to Face Advice
GWCT Advisory Scotland
'How to' Advice
Avian influenza Q & A
Conserving Our Woodcock
Lead Ammunition
Guides and Factsheets
Courses and Training Days
General Licences
Educational Materials
Shoot Benchmarking
FAQs
Game & Wildlife Glossary
Blogs
GWCT News Blog
Farming Blog
Allerton Project Research Blog
Auchnerran Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count Blog
Farmland Ecology Blog
Fisheries Blog
Loddington Estate Blog
Peter Thompson's Wildlife Blog
Rotherfield Demonstration Project Blog
Waders For Real Blog
Woodcock Watch Blog
Uplands Blog
Events
Calendar
Courses and Training Days
Scottish Game Fair
'The Last Keeper' Screenings
Join
Choose your Membership
Renew or Update Details
GWCT Insurance
Why join the GWCT?
How your membership helps
Testimonials
Sign up to our Newsletters
GWCT Morning Briefing Email
Join Offline
Donate
General Donation
Current Appeals
GWCT Raffles
Gun Draw
Grand Grouse Draw
Shoot Sweepstake
GWCT Shop
GWCT Art Gallery
The Allerton Project
In Memoriam Donations
Leaving a Legacy
Fundraising for the GWCT
Charitable Trusts and Foundations
Become a Sponsor
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2010-19
2000-09
1990-99
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
HUDSON1990
1980-89
1970-79
1960-69
1950-59
1940-49
1929-39
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Home
>
Research
>
Scientific Publications
>
1990-99
>
1990
>
HUDSON1990
Territorial status and survival in a low density grouse population: preliminary observations and experiments.
Author
Hudson, P.J.
Citation
Hudson, P.J. (1990). Territorial status and survival in a low density grouse population: preliminary observations and experiments. In: Lance, A. & Lawton, J. (eds) Red Grouse Population Processes: 20-28. Special Publication, British Ecological Society/Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Oxford.
Abstract
The role of territorial status and survival of female grouse was examined through radio-tracking and density-manipulation experiments. Sex ratios favoured males, and so monitoring and experiments concentrated on females as the sex which limited breeding density. No significant difference was found between the survival of territorial and non-territorial females, unlike earlier studies in north-east Scotland (Watson 1985). Territorial and non-territorial females were both more likely to die from predation than in previous studies.
In a low-density population in Speyside, the majority of heather-dominant moorland was not used by grouse in spring. Approximately 24% of grouse introduced into this low-density population (trap-and-transfer experiment) subsequently bred. The experiment was replicated a total of 5 times at different densities, and, on each occasion, introduced grouse subsequently bred. Removal of female grouse in spring recorded no non-territorial females, and numbers of territorial females were greater in spring than autumn.
On the main study area, significantly more corpses were the result of predation than in earlier studies, and this was associated with an apparently higher predator population, despite a lower grouse population. Muscle weights of female and male grouse alike were no different from those of grouse dying from accidents, suggesting that predators did not select weaker individuals.
About Us
Contact Us
Feedback
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Twitter
Facebook
Web Design by Mentor Digital