About Us
Policy
News
Shop
Scotland
Wales
Sign up to our Newsletters
Contact Us
Research
Search
Home
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Game
Get The Knowledge
GWCT Accredited Game Shot
GWCT Shoot Operator’s Test
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
2023 Breeding Woodcock Survey
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Black Grouse Appeal
Grey Partridge Appeal
Gamebird Releasing Appeal
Trail Camera Appeal
British Woodcock Appeal
Game and Conservation Benchmarking Survey
Shoot Managers' Newsletter
Wildlife
Research
Advice
News
Courses & Training Days
Working for Wildlife
Species of the Month
Managing for More
Action for Curlew
Curlew Badge
Waders For Real
Fox Diet Research Appeal
Wildlife Appeals
Farming
Farming Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count
Research
Advice
The Allerton Project
Auchnerran: Scottish Demonstration Farm
Farmer Clusters
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
GWCT Farming Newsletter
Fish
SAMARCH Project
The Missing Salmon Alliance
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Save Our Salmon Appeal
Salmon Badge
Volunteer
Fisheries Blog
Advice
Advice Blog
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
Meet our advisors
Face to Face Advice
GWCT Advisory Scotland
'How to' Advice
Avian influenza Q & A
Conserving Our Woodcock
Lead Ammunition
Guides and Factsheets
Courses and Training Days
General Licences
Educational Materials
Shoot Benchmarking
FAQs
Game & Wildlife Glossary
Blogs
GWCT News Blog
Farming Blog
Allerton Project Research Blog
Auchnerran Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count Blog
Farmland Ecology Blog
Fisheries Blog
Loddington Estate Blog
Peter Thompson's Wildlife Blog
Rotherfield Demonstration Project Blog
Waders For Real Blog
Woodcock Watch Blog
Uplands Blog
Events
Calendar
Courses and Training Days
Scottish Game Fair
'The Last Keeper' Screenings
Join
Choose your Membership
Renew or Update Details
GWCT Insurance
Why join the GWCT?
How your membership helps
Testimonials
Sign up to our Newsletters
GWCT Morning Briefing Email
Join Offline
Donate
General Donation
Current Appeals
GWCT Raffles
Gun Draw
Grand Grouse Draw
Shoot Sweepstake
GWCT Shop
GWCT Art Gallery
The Allerton Project
In Memoriam Donations
Leaving a Legacy
Fundraising for the GWCT
Charitable Trusts and Foundations
Become a Sponsor
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2010-19
2000-09
1990-99
1980-89
1989
1988
1987
SUNDERLAND1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1970-79
1960-69
1950-59
1940-49
1929-39
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Home
>
Research
>
Scientific Publications
>
1980-89
>
1987
>
SUNDERLAND1987
A study of feeding by polyphagous predators on cereal aphids using Elisa and gut dissection.
Author
Sunderland, K.D., Crook, N.E., Stacey, D.L., & Fuller, B.J.
Citation
Sunderland, K.D., Crook, N.E., Stacey, D.L., & Fuller, B.J. (1987). A study of feeding by polyphagous predators on cereal aphids using Elisa and gut dissection. Journal of Applied Ecology, 24: 907-933.
Abstract
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect aphid consumption by predators collected from three fields of winter wheat.
A total of 7781 predators belonging to 105 species was tested and 81 species were found to have eaten aphids at some time during the study.
An unexpectedly high percentage of many species had eaten aphids when aphid density was low, early in the season.
The relative efficiencies of ELISA and gut dissection for detecting prey remains varied according to the species of predator tested, and secondary predation was a potential problem, especially in the former technique.
In general, staphylinid beetles and beetle larvae digested their aphid meal much more rapidly than carabid beetles and spiders.
Field data on percentage of predators positive in ELISA and on predator density were combined with laboratory data on digestion rates to give predation indices which enabled comparison of species in terms of some aspects of their probable value as aphid predators. Spiders usually had the highest predation indices, but mites and adult and larval beetles were also of significance as aphid predators. It is concluded that aphid control by polyphagous predators is likely to be widely based.
Link
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2403989
About Us
Contact Us
Feedback
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Twitter
Facebook
Web Design by Mentor Digital