About Us
Policy
News
Shop
Scotland
Wales
Sign up to our Newsletters
Contact Us
Research
Search
Home
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Game
Get The Knowledge
GWCT Accredited Game Shot
GWCT Shoot Operator’s Test
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
2023 Breeding Woodcock Survey
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Black Grouse Appeal
Grey Partridge Appeal
Gamebird Releasing Appeal
Trail Camera Appeal
British Woodcock Appeal
Game and Conservation Benchmarking Survey
Shoot Managers' Newsletter
Wildlife
Research
Advice
News
Courses & Training Days
Working for Wildlife
Species of the Month
Managing for More
Action for Curlew
Curlew Badge
Waders For Real
Fox Diet Research Appeal
Wildlife Appeals
Farming
Farming Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count
Research
Advice
The Allerton Project
Auchnerran: Scottish Demonstration Farm
Farmer Clusters
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
GWCT Farming Newsletter
Fish
SAMARCH Project
The Missing Salmon Alliance
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Save Our Salmon Appeal
Salmon Badge
Volunteer
Fisheries Blog
Advice
Advice Blog
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
Meet our advisors
Face to Face Advice
GWCT Advisory Scotland
'How to' Advice
Avian influenza Q & A
Conserving Our Woodcock
Lead Ammunition
Guides and Factsheets
Courses and Training Days
General Licences
Educational Materials
Shoot Benchmarking
FAQs
Game & Wildlife Glossary
Blogs
GWCT News Blog
Farming Blog
Allerton Project Research Blog
Auchnerran Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count Blog
Farmland Ecology Blog
Fisheries Blog
Loddington Estate Blog
Peter Thompson's Wildlife Blog
Rotherfield Demonstration Project Blog
Waders For Real Blog
Woodcock Watch Blog
Uplands Blog
Events
Calendar
Courses and Training Days
Scottish Game Fair
'The Last Keeper' Screenings
Join
Choose your Membership
Renew or Update Details
GWCT Insurance
Why join the GWCT?
How your membership helps
Testimonials
Sign up to our Newsletters
GWCT Morning Briefing Email
Join Offline
Donate
General Donation
Current Appeals
GWCT Raffles
Gun Draw
Grand Grouse Draw
Shoot Sweepstake
GWCT Shop
GWCT Art Gallery
The Allerton Project
In Memoriam Donations
Leaving a Legacy
Fundraising for the GWCT
Charitable Trusts and Foundations
Become a Sponsor
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2010-19
2000-09
1990-99
1980-89
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
POTTS1984B
1983
1982
1981
1980
1970-79
1960-69
1950-59
1940-49
1929-39
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Home
>
Research
>
Scientific Publications
>
1980-89
>
1984
>
POTTS1984B
Population fluctuations in Red Grouse: analysis of bag records and a simulation model.
Author
Potts, G.R., Tapper, S.C., & Hudson, P.J.
Citation
Potts, G.R., Tapper, S.C., & Hudson, P.J. (1984). Population fluctuations in Red Grouse: analysis of bag records and a simulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology, 53: 21-36.
Abstract
A time-series analysis of numbers of red grouse (
Lagopus lagopus
) shot per annum was carried out for fifty-two moors in northern England where data were available for at least 20 consecutive years during the period 1870-1977. Correlograms were constructed and auto-correlation coefficients were tested for statistical significance.
In the most representative sub-sample of moors, 83% of the series had significant negative coefficients at
T
+ 2 or
T
+ 3 years or both. A mathematical model was fitted to the fluctuations to describe their quasi-cyclic nature and the average 'cycle-length' was found to be 4.84 +- 0.086 years.
Field observations and data from trials with captive grouse were combined to construct a simulation model of a red grouse population; its main features were:
(a) An inverse logistic curve relating mean numbers of the parasitic nematode
Trichostrongylus tenuis
in adult red grouse to their breeding success.
(b)
T. tenuis
accumulation by young red grouse to steady state levels. The numbers of worms accumulated per bird varied according to a combined effect of the density of grouse prior to the breeding season and the worm burden of these grouse.
(c) A logistic curve relating the proportion of grouse shot with the density of grouse available.
(d) An annual survival rate of the non-shot population inversely proportional to the density of old grouse.
The simulation model successfully captured mean levels and other population parameters. However, it only gave a good fit to observed fluctuation patterns when stochastic elements were introduced to represent known effects of weather.
The model showed that red grouse cycles could be caused by effects of
T. tenuis
working together with stochastic elements and a time delay arising from the uptake of worms.
Link
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4339
About Us
Contact Us
Feedback
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Twitter
Facebook
Web Design by Mentor Digital