About Us
Policy
News
Shop
Scotland
Wales
Sign up to our Newsletters
Contact Us
Research
Search
Home
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Game
Get The Knowledge
GWCT Accredited Game Shot
GWCT Shoot Operator’s Test
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
2023 Breeding Woodcock Survey
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Black Grouse Appeal
Grey Partridge Appeal
Gamebird Releasing Appeal
Trail Camera Appeal
British Woodcock Appeal
Game and Conservation Benchmarking Survey
Shoot Managers' Newsletter
Wildlife
Research
Advice
News
Courses & Training Days
Working for Wildlife
Species of the Month
Managing for More
Action for Curlew
Curlew Badge
Waders For Real
Fox Diet Research Appeal
Wildlife Appeals
Farming
Farming Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count
Research
Advice
The Allerton Project
Auchnerran: Scottish Demonstration Farm
Farmer Clusters
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
GWCT Farming Newsletter
Fish
SAMARCH Project
The Missing Salmon Alliance
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Save Our Salmon Appeal
Salmon Badge
Volunteer
Fisheries Blog
Advice
Advice Blog
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
Meet our advisors
Face to Face Advice
GWCT Advisory Scotland
'How to' Advice
Avian influenza Q & A
Conserving Our Woodcock
Lead Ammunition
Guides and Factsheets
Courses and Training Days
General Licences
Educational Materials
Shoot Benchmarking
FAQs
Game & Wildlife Glossary
Blogs
GWCT News Blog
Farming Blog
Allerton Project Research Blog
Auchnerran Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count Blog
Farmland Ecology Blog
Fisheries Blog
Loddington Estate Blog
Peter Thompson's Wildlife Blog
Rotherfield Demonstration Project Blog
Waders For Real Blog
Woodcock Watch Blog
Uplands Blog
Events
Calendar
Courses and Training Days
Scottish Game Fair
'The Last Keeper' Screenings
Join
Choose your Membership
Renew or Update Details
GWCT Insurance
Why join the GWCT?
How your membership helps
Testimonials
Sign up to our Newsletters
GWCT Morning Briefing Email
Join Offline
Donate
General Donation
Current Appeals
GWCT Raffles
Gun Draw
Grand Grouse Draw
Shoot Sweepstake
GWCT Shop
GWCT Art Gallery
The Allerton Project
In Memoriam Donations
Leaving a Legacy
Fundraising for the GWCT
Charitable Trusts and Foundations
Become a Sponsor
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2010-19
2000-09
1990-99
1980-89
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
CHAMBERS1983
1982
1981
1980
1970-79
1960-69
1950-59
1940-49
1929-39
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Home
>
Research
>
Scientific Publications
>
1980-89
>
1983
>
CHAMBERS1983
The effects of predator exclusion and caging on cereal aphids in winter wheat.
Author
Chambers, R.J., Sunderland, K.D., Wyatt, I.J., & Vickerman, G.P.
Citation
Chambers, R.J., Sunderland, K.D., Wyatt, I.J., & Vickerman, G.P. (1983). The effects of predator exclusion and caging on cereal aphids in winter wheat. Journal of Applied Ecology, 20: 209-224.
Abstract
Changes in numbers of cereal aphids were measured inside and outside cages designed to exclude aphid specific predators (certain Coccinellidae. Syrphidae and Chrysopidae) in a field of winter wheat in 1976, 1977 and 1979.
In each year, three phases of aphid population development were distinguished; an initial rapid growth phase, a divergence phase, and a decline phase. Populations in the cages increased at the same rate as outside during the growth phase, and during the divergence phase continued to increase to a peak while populations outside increased at a slower rate or decreased. As a result of the divergence, a difference in peak numbers of up to six times was recorded. Populations outside fell rapidly during the decline phase while a slower reduction occurred in the cages.
In the 3 years, the divergence phase coincided with an increase in the numbers of aphid specific predators. The consumption rate by predators that would be required to bring about the observed differences between cages and outside was calculated and found to lie within published values. It was concluded that predation was likely to be the major cause of the differences between cages and outside to the time of the population peak. Predation, parasitism, disease and emigration all contributed to the decline phase.
Although there was no difference in plant growth stage inside and outside the cages, and the divergence phase occurred at different growth stages in the 3 years, it was not possible to rule out a subtle effect of the caging technique itself on the physiology of the plant or aphid, acting only during the divergence phase.
Link
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2403387
About Us
Contact Us
Feedback
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Twitter
Facebook
Web Design by Mentor Digital