About Us
Policy
News
Shop
Scotland
Wales
Sign up to our Newsletters
Contact Us
Research
Search
Home
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Game
Get The Knowledge
GWCT Accredited Game Shot
GWCT Shoot Operator’s Test
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
2023 Breeding Woodcock Survey
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Black Grouse Appeal
Grey Partridge Appeal
Gamebird Releasing Appeal
Trail Camera Appeal
British Woodcock Appeal
Game and Conservation Benchmarking Survey
Shoot Managers' Newsletter
Wildlife
Research
Advice
News
Courses & Training Days
Working for Wildlife
Species of the Month
Managing for More
Action for Curlew
Curlew Badge
Waders For Real
Fox Diet Research Appeal
Wildlife Appeals
Farming
Farming Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count
Research
Advice
The Allerton Project
Auchnerran: Scottish Demonstration Farm
Farmer Clusters
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
GWCT Farming Newsletter
Fish
SAMARCH Project
The Missing Salmon Alliance
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Save Our Salmon Appeal
Salmon Badge
Volunteer
Fisheries Blog
Advice
Advice Blog
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
Meet our advisors
Face to Face Advice
GWCT Advisory Scotland
'How to' Advice
Avian influenza Q & A
Conserving Our Woodcock
Lead Ammunition
Guides and Factsheets
Courses and Training Days
General Licences
Educational Materials
Shoot Benchmarking
FAQs
Game & Wildlife Glossary
Blogs
GWCT News Blog
Farming Blog
Allerton Project Research Blog
Auchnerran Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count Blog
Farmland Ecology Blog
Fisheries Blog
Loddington Estate Blog
Peter Thompson's Wildlife Blog
Rotherfield Demonstration Project Blog
Waders For Real Blog
Woodcock Watch Blog
Uplands Blog
Events
Calendar
Courses and Training Days
Scottish Game Fair
'The Last Keeper' Screenings
Join
Choose your Membership
Renew or Update Details
GWCT Insurance
Why join the GWCT?
How your membership helps
Testimonials
Sign up to our Newsletters
GWCT Morning Briefing Email
Join Offline
Donate
General Donation
Current Appeals
GWCT Raffles
Gun Draw
Grand Grouse Draw
Shoot Sweepstake
GWCT Shop
GWCT Art Gallery
The Allerton Project
In Memoriam Donations
Leaving a Legacy
Fundraising for the GWCT
Charitable Trusts and Foundations
Become a Sponsor
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2010-19
2000-09
1990-99
1980-89
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
SUNDERLAND1980
1970-79
1960-69
1950-59
1940-49
1929-39
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Home
>
Research
>
Scientific Publications
>
1980-89
>
1980
>
SUNDERLAND1980
Aphid feeding by some polyphagous predators in relation to aphid density in cereal fields.
Author
Sunderland, K.D. & Vickerman, G.P.
Citation
Sunderland, K.D. & Vickerman, G.P. (1980). Aphid feeding by some polyphagous predators in relation to aphid density in cereal fields. Journal of Applied Ecology, 17: 389-396.
Abstract
Samples of aphids and predators were taken from ten spring barley and winter wheat fields between May and September 1972-77.
The guts of c. 12 000 predators were dissected and the presence or absence of aphid remains recorded. Sixteen species of Carabidae, three species of Staphylinidae and one species of earwig were shown to have fed on aphids.
No overall relationship was found between the amount of feeding and aphid densities in the different years. But, when the species were considered separately, it was found that the proportion containing aphid remains increased with aphid density, though the form of this relationship varied between species.
Tachyporus
spp. had a limited response to aphid density and
Amara plebeja
,
A. aenea
and
Notiophilus biguttatus
ate aphids only at higher aphid densities.
Forficula auricularia,
Agonum dorsale
and
Demetrias atricapillus
were the most important, both in terms of the overall percentage containing aphid remains, and the predation index (proportion containing aphid remains during the aphid increase phase multiplied by the mean density of the predator at this time). These three species should be the most valuable in restricting build up of aphids.
Successful aphid predation at low aphid density may be partly related to the climbing ability of the predator.
Link
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2402334
About Us
Contact Us
Feedback
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Twitter
Facebook
Web Design by Mentor Digital