About Us
Policy
News
Shop
Scotland
Wales
Sign up to our Newsletters
Contact Us
Research
Search
Home
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Game
Get The Knowledge
GWCT Accredited Game Shot
GWCT Shoot Operator’s Test
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
2023 Breeding Woodcock Survey
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Black Grouse Appeal
Grey Partridge Appeal
Gamebird Releasing Appeal
Trail Camera Appeal
British Woodcock Appeal
Game and Conservation Benchmarking Survey
Shoot Managers' Newsletter
Wildlife
Research
Advice
News
Courses & Training Days
Working for Wildlife
Species of the Month
Managing for More
Action for Curlew
Curlew Badge
Waders For Real
Fox Diet Research Appeal
Wildlife Appeals
Farming
Farming Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count
Research
Advice
The Allerton Project
Auchnerran: Scottish Demonstration Farm
Farmer Clusters
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
GWCT Farming Newsletter
Fish
SAMARCH Project
The Missing Salmon Alliance
Research
Advice
Policy
News
Courses & Training Days
Save Our Salmon Appeal
Salmon Badge
Volunteer
Fisheries Blog
Advice
Advice Blog
GWCT Shoot Biodiversity Tool
Meet our advisors
Face to Face Advice
GWCT Advisory Scotland
'How to' Advice
Avian influenza Q & A
Conserving Our Woodcock
Lead Ammunition
Guides and Factsheets
Courses and Training Days
General Licences
Educational Materials
Shoot Benchmarking
FAQs
Game & Wildlife Glossary
Blogs
GWCT News Blog
Farming Blog
Allerton Project Research Blog
Auchnerran Blog
Big Farmland Bird Count Blog
Farmland Ecology Blog
Fisheries Blog
Loddington Estate Blog
Peter Thompson's Wildlife Blog
Rotherfield Demonstration Project Blog
Waders For Real Blog
Woodcock Watch Blog
Uplands Blog
Events
Calendar
Courses and Training Days
Scottish Game Fair
'The Last Keeper' Screenings
Join
Choose your Membership
Renew or Update Details
GWCT Insurance
Why join the GWCT?
How your membership helps
Testimonials
Sign up to our Newsletters
GWCT Morning Briefing Email
Join Offline
Donate
General Donation
Current Appeals
GWCT Raffles
Gun Draw
Grand Grouse Draw
Shoot Sweepstake
GWCT Shop
GWCT Art Gallery
The Allerton Project
In Memoriam Donations
Leaving a Legacy
Fundraising for the GWCT
Charitable Trusts and Foundations
Become a Sponsor
Research
Species
Habitats
Long-Term Monitoring
Demonstration Projects
Our Research in Practice
Annual Reviews
Scientific Publications
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2010-19
2000-09
1990-99
1980-89
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
BIBBY1980
1970-79
1960-69
1950-59
1940-49
1929-39
Plain English Summaries
What the Science Says
Home
>
Research
>
Scientific Publications
>
1980-89
>
1980
>
BIBBY1980
Foraging behaviour of migrant pied flycatchers,
Ficedula hypoleuca
, on temporary territories.
Author
Bibby, C.J. & Green, R.E.
Citation
Bibby, C.J. & Green, R.E. (1980). Foraging behaviour of migrant pied flycatchers,
Ficedula hypoleuca
, on temporary territories. Journal of Animal Ecology, 49: 507-521.
Abstract
Pied flycatchers
Ficedula hypoleuca
on a migration stop-over in Portugal were accumulating reserves at a rate of 0.34 g d
-1
for a trans-Saharan flight. Marked birds occupied limited feeding ranges which were defended against conspecifics but not other species.
The flycatchers foraged for active arthropods with the predominant items of diet being ants, wasps and beetles. Capture attempts were clumped in time which was taken to mean that prey were clumped in space.
Within a tree a bird's feeding rate declined exponentially the longer it foraged there.
For one bird the time taken to find a new feeding place varied four-fold between observation sessions. This could not be explained by time of day or temperature and was taken to reflect prey availability. In poor feeding conditions the bird stayed longer in each tree or nearby after encountering food. To this extent variations of feeding strategy appeared consistent with optimal foraging theory though direct measurements of prey dispersion were lacking.
The recovery of prey patches following a bird's departure was such that most occurred within 10-15 min. Birds did not move round their territories on a random walk but tended to proceed in a circuit (albeit with many reversals). Probably as a result, trees tended to be revisited after intervals of about 12 min.
Territory circuiting behaviour spaced repeat visits to trees in such a way as to enhance the birds' rate of encounter with prey. It was not possible to assess the net benefit of exclusive territoriality and circuiting to the flycatchers since the costs of defence could not be estimated.
Link
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4260
About Us
Contact Us
Feedback
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Events
Twitter
Facebook
Web Design by Mentor Digital