10/1/2023

Defra minister argues for a balanced approach in snaring debate

Snare Video

This Monday (9 January), the Petitions Committee debated a recent e-petition calling for a ban on the use of snares. Nick Fletcher, who brought the petition, gave a detailed account of how a humane cable restraint, pioneered by the GWCT, differs from a traditional snare.

This point was driven home by Jim Shannon, DUP MP for Strangford, who noted that “the snares of yesteryear are not acceptable, but the humane restraints that the Government permit today are a way of moving forward.” Talking about the impact of fox predation on livestock as well as ground-nesting birds, he said “This serious problem must have a serious solution, and I feel that humane cable restraints are and must be accepted as such.”

“I hope we will continue to responsibly use cable restraints as a way of managing our countryside and ensuring that our wildlife and our economic interests in terms of game and agriculture are protected.”

Sir Robert Goodwill, Conservative MP for Scarborough and Whitby, outlined the limitations of other means of fox control such as shooting, noting that “the alternatives do not bear much scrutiny in terms of their relative humaneness” and that “I hope we will continue to responsibly use cable restraints as a way of managing our countryside and ensuring that our wildlife and our economic interests in terms of game and agriculture are protected.”

There was a clear distinction between those with practical experience of the countryside and the role of snares. In fact, Mr Fletcher himself made this point very clear in his opening remarks, in which he stated “A relative townie like me can easily sit in an armchair and say that the use of snares is wrong and even barbaric, but I am conscious that I have little understanding of the countryside and the steps necessary to protect it. Those who have spent their lives in the countryside say snares are necessary. We need to know who is right and who is wrong—we need evidence.”

Those supporting the petition highlighted the fact that there are 188,000 snares in operation at any time (based on a 2012 Defra report citing a range of 62,823-188,283) and challenged whether we should be controlling species rather than using snares. Rachael Maskell, Labour MP for York Central argued that “we cannot continue to believe that we have a right and a power over nature. Nature will find its balance, and it is important that we nurture and enable that balance” and called for alternatives such as changes to farming techniques and a higher intensity of shepherds to protect new-born lambs, before stating that “we should end the vilification of foxes”, while Conservative MP Tracey Crouch declared her opinion that “there is no humane way to snare a wild animal”. Oliva Blake, Labour MP for Sheffield Hallam also called for alternatives including “electric fencing, wire netting, motion sprinklers, ultrasonic devices or the use of radios and reflective surfaces”, the effectiveness of which was challenged by Sir Robert Goodwill, particularly at scale.

CLI366.curlew .CLDukeof Norfolk Curlewproject 147-920x 613

“I am aware that we must protect lapwings, curlew and other ground-nesting birds” 

Bringing the debate to a close, Trudy Harrison, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs highlighted the lived experience of Jim Shannon and Sir Robert Goodwill by saying “It is of particular relevance that we have heard from two farmers with first-hand lived experience.” She called for improved information about the correct use of snaring, something the GWCT is happy to support. With Welsh and Scottish governments reviewing the use of snares, the Defra Secretary ended the session by stating “I reiterate that I will work with the devolved Administrations to understand the implications, but I am also aware that we must protect lapwings, curlew and other ground-nesting birds, so we will take a balanced approach. We will observe how friends in the devolved Administrations implement their proposed changes to snaring. I hope we can learn from the different approaches. I will certainly keep an open mind about whether any new rules and regulations are required in England in the future.”

You can watch the proceedings here or read Hansard here. We will continue our work to improve standards and ensure that the tools required to support biodiversity are humane and effective.

Thank you for reading this item. The GWCT conducts leading research, challenges misinformation and promotes effective strategies in the countryside. We are a small charity and every donation can make a big impact. It's quick and all cards, Direct Debit, Apple Pay, Google Pay and PayPal are accepted:

Comments

Interference in running the countryside

at 21:28 on 22/01/2023 by Byron Lovesey

The most annoying part about any interference from the armchair brigade that live in there big houses and eat there protein shakes don’t have a clue how any thing works in the countryside or in-fact in any part of nature town or countryside , everything has consequences, the mith that nature will sort itself out is pathetic as proved in the rewinding in Sweden were deer were left to multiply and starve with disease a real danger

Foxes

at 15:29 on 17/01/2023 by Moi

In Switzerland, in the absence of other carnivores, and targeting foxes, I believe they use baited contraception dropped from helicopters once a year. It apparently was the most successful method of any in history. There was a documentary about it some years ago. If I'm not mistaken, contraception has been successfully used for many species, including mosquitoes. Also, it is common knowledge most of the lambs are dead or dying if a fox gets them.

Fox Snaring

at 12:18 on 17/01/2023 by WBW

Once again , the same hot air that has become commonplace with these armchair experts and a lack of any proper practical experience from the likes of Maskell ,Crouch and Hallam. Maskell comments that nature will find a balance. Nature will not find a balance. Predators are opportunists and as such ,will prosper to the detriment of their prey . Birds like Curlew , oystercatcher, lapwing etc are all struggling . They need all the help they can , keepers are the very people that can help redress the balance . This involves controlling predators. Capercaillie are a classic example. While debates rage about Pine Martens and Goshawks , Caper are dying out . I dare say that even if both those species were taken off the protected list , it is too late to save Capercaillie. Snares/Cable restraints ,call them what you will have a place in countryside management. Leave countryside management to those that know , namely keepers .

More shepherds

at 8:49 on 11/01/2023 by Simon Denny

I am interested to know how Rachael Maskell MP proposes to pay for the many more shepherds that will be needed to provide round-the-clock protection for livestock from fox predation. I do not think the farmers I know will be able to afford it.

Make a comment