29/10/2019

Strange move if RSPB make U-turn and oppose game shooting: Our letter to The Telegraph

It sounds unlikely the RSPB would decide to oppose shooting (report, October 28) because they have spent the past ten years helping to fund the recovery of a driven grouse moor, at Langholm on the Scottish Borders, which aimed to shoot 1,000 brace a season. They supported the use of traditional moorland practices, such as heather burning to restore the habitat, the killing of foxes and crows to help recover the ground-nesting bird species, and the use of medicated grit to reduce worm burdens in red grouse.

All of these techniques are regulated, but legislation does not always work – especially in cases of wildlife conflict. Langholm Moor has also provided the best evidence that the conflict between red grouse and hen harriers is genuine. This is why the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust supports the testing of innovative ideas, such as Defra’s hen harrier brood management scheme, which seeks to address the underlying conflict behind the illegal killing of harriers – in the interests of both.

Andrew Gilruth
Director of Communications, GWCT

2020 GWCT Badge
Show your support for the GWCT with one of our new badges

Proudly show your support for our vital conservation work by wearing one of our new 2020 badges.

View All Badges >

Comments

RSPB

at 11:51 on 29/10/2019 by Jeffrey Olstead

I believe that quite a few years ago the then GCT was contracted by the RSPB to undertake a survey of bird species on moorland. The result was that moors managed for shooting held 36 species while unmanaged moorland maintained about half that figure. If I'm right, and the RSPB funded and accepted that report, it would certainly undermine any attack on grouse shooting. It would be good to estimate the benefits for songbirds of of winter feed through pheasant feeders and game cover, especially in arable country.

Make a comment